{"id":12871,"date":"2026-10-26T16:24:49","date_gmt":"2026-10-26T12:24:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/?p=12871"},"modified":"2026-10-28T12:16:12","modified_gmt":"2026-10-28T08:16:12","slug":"targeting-armenias-state-agency","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/targeting-armenias-state-agency\/","title":{"rendered":"Targeting Armenia\u2019s State Agency: Information and Hybrid Tools and Russia\u2019s Attempts to Restore Its Influence"},"content":{"rendered":"

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text woodmart_inline=”no” text_larger=”no”]<\/p>\n

Geopolitical competition in the post-Soviet region did not end with the collapse of the Soviet Union. The aspirations of states across the region to pursue independent foreign policies and choose their own security and development paths continue to clash with Russia\u2019s efforts to preserve or reassert its influence in the region. Economic and military leverage is deployed alongside political pressure and information-based influence tactics, shaping not only the foreign policy behaviour of target states but also their domestic political dynamics.<\/p>\n

As Armenia seeks to diversify its foreign policy and reduce its strategic dependence on Russia, it has become a focal point of this geopolitical contest. Within Armenia\u2019s domestic political arena, narratives questioning the government\u2019s legitimacy, the effectiveness of state governance, and the viability of the peace process with Azerbaijan circulate alongside similar narratives in Russian media and political discourse. In some instances, these messages converge not only in substance but also in the timing of their dissemination, raising legitimate questions about their interconnection and the possibility of coordinated efforts to advance specific political objectives.<\/p>\n

This raises a central question: are Russia and actors in Armenia whose actions align with Russian interests seeking to foster systemic distrust in Armenia\u2019s capacity to act as a sovereign state? Do the exaggeration of shortcomings in public administration, the politicisation of security incidents, the discrediting of the peace process, and the portrayal of Russia as an \u201cindispensable guarantor\u201d serve this broader objective?<\/p>\n

The analysis explores how narratives advanced by political actors in Armenia intersect with Russia\u2019s broader information and political influence efforts, the role domestic political actors play in amplifying these narratives, and how their interaction may affect Armenia\u2019s ability to make independent strategic choices.<\/p>\n

The State-Incapacity Narrative and the Mechanisms Behind Its Amplification<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

A key mechanism through which the narrative of state incapacity is amplified is the political magnification of individual incidents. A specific event is detached from its immediate context and presented as unequivocal evidence of systemic governance failure and the state’s inability to protect its territory and citizens. This dynamic was particularly evident in some political and media responses to the incident<\/span><\/a> that took place on October 1, 2026, in the settlement of\u00a0Shaki<\/span><\/a>, in Armenia’s Syunik Province.<\/p>\n

According to information released by Armenian law enforcement authorities, on September 29, Azerbaijan’s State Security Service informed the Armenian side that one of its servicemen was missing, while not ruling out the possibility that he had crossed the Armenian state border. On October 1, the Azerbaijani serviceman was\u00a0found<\/span><\/a>\u00a0inside a private residence in Shaki. After being discovered, he opened fire, injuring the woman who owned the house and causing injuries to the children. He was detained by Armenian authorities later that day, and criminal proceedings were initiated in connection with the incident.<\/p>\n

The incident raises legitimate questions about border control, civilian safety, the effectiveness of the state response, and strategic communications. Yet much of the\u00a0political reaction<\/span><\/a>,\u00a0including commentary<\/span><\/a>\u00a0on the peace process<\/span><\/a>, focused less on examining these substantive issues and identifying specific shortcomings than on presenting the incident as conclusive proof that Armenia was incapable of controlling its own borders and that the\u00a0peace process had failed<\/span><\/a>.<\/p>\n

No state, regardless of its military capabilities, technological sophistication, or level of border protection, can\u00a0completely eliminate all instances of illegal border crossing<\/span><\/a>. The effectiveness of state institutions is measured not by the absolute absence of such incidents, but by their capacity to prevent and detect them, respond appropriately, and manage their consequences. The Shaki incident could therefore have served as a basis for identifying and examining specific shortcomings in Armenia’s border security system. Instead, the parliamentary opposition seized on it to reinforce the claim that the state was incapable of controlling its own borders.<\/p>\n

The significance of this narrative extends well beyond the exploitation of an individual border incident. Its broader political function lies in linking a specific security failure to a much larger claim: that Armenia cannot secure peace or protect itself without an external guarantor. In this framing, the incident becomes not merely a reason to scrutinise border security, but an argument against the viability of Armenia’s peace agenda and, ultimately, its capacity to pursue an independent security policy. The geopolitical implications are significant, particularly in light of Russia’s efforts to preserve its geopolitical standing and reassert its influence in the South Caucasus.<\/p>\n

For decades, the protracted conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan\u00a0enabled Moscow<\/span><\/a>\u00a0to position itself as an\u00a0indispensable security guarantor and mediator<\/span><\/a>, securing institutionalised leverage and influence over regional processes. The consolidation of the peace agenda and the\u00a0initialling of the peace agreement<\/span><\/a>\u00a0have significantly weakened this leverage, expanding Yerevan’s and Baku’s ability to regulate their relations through independent decisions guided by their respective national interests.<\/p>\n

Against this backdrop, attempts by pro-Russian actors within Armenia to revive the rhetoric of conflict amount to more than criticism of the peace process. When security incidents are repeatedly presented as evidence that peace is unattainable, while the absence of peace is invoked to justify the need for an external guarantor, the resulting narrative helps legitimise a return to the very political environment in which Russia could once again position itself as the region’s sole and indispensable security guarantor. Unresolved relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan thus become a potential instrument for restoring Moscow’s influence in Armenia, while efforts to discredit the peace agenda risk undermining public confidence in the country’s foreign policy diversification.<\/p>\n

The next step is to examine how recurring and closely aligned narratives circulate across Armenian and Russian information spaces, and how their mutual amplification may reinforce the broader narrative of state incapacity.<\/p>\n

The Information Ecosystem: Interconnected Networks and Russia\u2019s Toolkit of Influence<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

Narratives questioning Armenia\u2019s state capacity, foreign policy autonomy, and peace agenda circulate across both the domestic political sphere and Russia\u2019s information and political environment. Their dissemination does not necessarily involve the verbatim repetition of identical formulations. More often, the same core message is conveyed through different sources and with varying emphases, tailored to the political preferences and concerns of target audiences or to the political expediency of those disseminating it at a given moment. One of the most comprehensive investigations documenting this mechanism was published on October 12, 2026, in a\u00a0joint study<\/span><\/a>\u00a0by DFRLab, FIP.am, LetsData, and their partners. The study identified four coordinated networks involving more than 100 Facebook pages, interconnected websites, and Telegram channels. These networks disseminated alarmist messages about the Armenia\u2013Azerbaijan normalisation process, including claims that Armenia had agreed to accept approximately 300,000 Azerbaijanis, that the country was being transformed into a so-called \u201cWestern Azerbaijan,\u201d and that the incumbent government\u2019s re-election could lead to another war. The researchers found that these networks predominantly amplified and promoted opposition and pro-Russian positions. Some of the identified pages ceased activity just two days after the elections, suggesting that their primary purpose was to exert targeted influence on public perceptions during the pre-election period.<\/p>\n

The significance of this study lies not merely in exposing false or misleading content, but also in identifying the mechanisms through which specific political messages are artificially amplified. One network, comprising more than 30 pages, disseminated statements by opposition figures while presenting itself as an entertainment-oriented, apolitical platform. Another network, encompassing more than 50 pages, systematically republished content from Past.am, a pro-Russian media outlet. Several other pages employed a doppelg\u00e4nger tactic, mimicking the names and visual identities of established news organisations. The connections between these platforms were established not only through similarities in content but also through technical indicators, including identical posts, shared infrastructure markers, and synchronised dissemination within minutes or even seconds. These findings point not simply to coincidental similarities among sources expressing comparable views, but to mechanisms of coordinated amplification.<\/p>\n

The same pattern was also documented on\u00a0Telegram<\/span><\/a>. An\u00a0analysis of posts across several channels<\/span><\/a>\u00a0found that, between May 8 and June 14, 2026, two channels disseminated identical content 572 and 530 times, respectively. In many instances, the posts appeared within the same minute and, in numerous cases, within the very same second. The material included identical links, images, reposts, and other content. The researchers identified this pattern as a clear indicator of coordinated activity or common management. Notably, the same channels were involved in disseminating multiple narratives, including claims about \u201cWestern Azerbaijan,\u201d the alleged resettlement of 300,000 Azerbaijanis, and the prospect of renewed war. Taken together, these findings suggest that the channels form part of a broader, organised information ecosystem through which multiple narratives are disseminated and amplified.<\/p>\n

The study also demonstrates how domestic political discourse and Russia\u2019s information environment complement one another. In one of the networks examined, narratives portraying Russia as an economically and strategically indispensable partner for Armenia predominated, while closer relations with the European Union were framed as a choice entailing existential threats. In another network, Armenian political content was amplified through platforms bearing technical traces linking them to Russian websites and a Russian-language operator. The study thus documents specific mechanisms through which pro-Russian narratives are systematically disseminated and Armenian opposition discourse deliberately amplified.<\/p>\n

These findings point to a broader strategic problem: the systematic amplification of political narratives through interconnected information networks. While an individual post may represent an isolated political position or a discrete instance of information manipulation, the dissemination of identical content across interconnected pages and channels, within short time intervals and across multiple platforms, points to a coordinated effort to shape public perceptions. The use of such mechanisms can intensify public anxiety surrounding the peace process and foster antagonistic attitudes towards Armenia\u2019s security and foreign policy choices. When domestic political criticism becomes intertwined with these dissemination infrastructures, it can reach audiences far beyond its original base, creating the false impression that a particular narrative is dominant in society or is universally accepted.<\/p>\n

The Political Logic Behind Russia\u2019s Efforts to Preserve Its Influence<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

To understand Russia\u2019s information influence in Armenia, we need to examine both how these narratives are disseminated and what strategic and political objectives they serve. When separate events, domestic political tensions, and foreign policy challenges are framed as interconnected manifestations of a broader problem, they can reinforce one another and lend greater credibility to a common narrative.<\/p>\n

The effectiveness of such manipulative narratives does not depend on the claims they advance being entirely false. Often, the more effective approach is to selectively highlight genuine problems, exaggerate their significance, and deliberately link them together while overlooking the state\u2019s response, the actual scale of the challenges, and the systemic measures taken to address them. An individual incident is thus recast as evidence of systemic governance failure; economic challenges are invoked to argue that foreign policy diversification is not feasible; and the risks associated with the peace process with Azerbaijan are presented as proof that Armenia cannot ensure its own security.\u00a0The cumulative effect is to portray Armenia not simply as a state facing serious challenges, but as one incapable of managing them without external assistance.<\/b><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

Similar mechanisms have been employed in Russian information operations targeting other countries. The “Internet Research Agency”, associated with Yevgeny Prigozhin, and campaigns such as Storm-1516 and Operation Overload illustrate how fabricated content, doppelg\u00e4nger websites and accounts impersonating legitimate sources, automated dissemination, and the exploitation of domestic political tensions can be used to undermine public trust in state institutions and political processes. Documented Russian influence operations targeting elections in Moldova likewise demonstrate the use of such methods, particularly in contexts where domestic political divisions intersect with geopolitical competition over a country\u2019s political choices and foreign policy orientation.<\/p>\n

In Armenia, the narrative of state incapacity undermines public confidence not only in the incumbent government but also in the ability of state institutions to function effectively. When government shortcomings and mistakes are framed not as problems to be addressed through political accountability, civic oversight, and institutional reform, but as evidence that Armenia cannot sustain its independent statehood, criticism of the government is recast as a broader indictment of the viability of the Armenian state itself. This framing also narrows the perceived range of political alternatives. If the public is repeatedly led to believe that Armenia cannot overcome its challenges on its own, reliance on an external security \u201cguarantor\u201d can appear not as one possible political choice, but as the only viable option.<\/p>\n

Assessing Russia\u2019s information influence therefore requires more than counting fake accounts, websites, or disseminated messages. The more important task is to understand the political perceptions these activities seek to shape and how different narratives are brought together to reinforce two central claims: that Armenia is incapable of functioning independently and that an external \u201cguarantor\u201d is indispensable.<\/p>\n

The political purpose of this influence becomes clearer when viewed in the broader context of Russia\u2019s strategic objectives across the post-Soviet space. For decades, Moscow has treated the sovereignty of former Soviet republics as acceptable only insofar as it does not conflict with, and preferably serves, Russia\u2019s strategic interests. Russia\u2019s war of aggression against Ukraine represents the most extreme manifestation of this approach, but the underlying logic extends beyond the use of military force. Through political, economic, and information-psychological instruments of influence, Russia seeks to preserve its ability to shape the strategic choices of neighbouring states.<\/p>\n

A related feature of this approach is the portrayal of post-Soviet states as political entities with limited capacity for independent existence. The term\u00a0nedogosudarstvo<\/i><\/span>\u00a0(\u201cincomplete state\u201d), used in Russian political discourse, reflects an ideological outlook in which the sovereignty of certain states is treated as conditional, while their security and stability are portrayed as dependent on external -specifically Russian – patronage. This framing allows the preservation or expansion of Russian influence to be presented not as interference in the affairs of sovereign states, but as a necessary means of preventing instability and ensuring their security.<\/p>\n

In Armenia\u2019s case, this logic is reflected in narratives that undermine confidence in the country\u2019s state capacity. The deepening of Armenia\u2019s relations with the United States and the European Union, regional connectivity initiatives, and the process of normalising relations with Azerbaijan have significantly weakened Russia\u2019s position as an indispensable mediator and security guarantor. Against this backdrop, eroding confidence in Armenia\u2019s state institutions serves the interests of actors seeking to restore Russian influence in the country.<\/p>\n

The analysis presented here suggests that narratives undermining confidence in Armenia\u2019s state capacity should be understood within the broader political context of Russia\u2019s efforts to restore its influence. Claims that the state is incapable of functioning independently, that peace is unattainable, and that an external \u201cguarantor\u201d is indispensable converge on a common premise: that Armenia can remain viable as a state only under Russian patronage. Strengthening Armenia\u2019s resilience therefore requires more than identifying and countering information interference and the mechanisms through which it spreads. It also requires fostering an environment in which state institutions are subject to legitimate scrutiny and criticism without such criticism being turned into an argument against Armenia\u2019s capacity to function as an independent, sovereign state.<\/p>\n

Author: Elen Hohikyan<\/b><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

This version of the article was translated from the original Armenian with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) tools and has been reviewed for accuracy.<\/p>\n

This article was prepared with the support of the Democracy Development Foundation. Responsibility for the content rests with the Women and Global Security Architecture (WGSA) think tank and does not necessarily reflect the official position of the Democracy Development Foundation.<\/p>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text woodmart_inline=”no” text_larger=”no”] Geopolitical competition in the post-Soviet region did not end with the collapse of the Soviet Union. The<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":12873,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[81],"tags":[179,225,124],"class_list":["post-12871","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-articles-en","tag-armenia","tag-azerbaijan","tag-russia"],"yoast_head":"\nTargeting Armenia\u2019s State Agency: Information and Hybrid Tools and Russia\u2019s Attempts to Restore Its Influence - WGSA<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/targeting-armenias-state-agency\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Targeting Armenia\u2019s State Agency: Information and Hybrid Tools and Russia\u2019s Attempts to Restore Its Influence - WGSA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text woodmart_inline=”no” text_larger=”no”] Geopolitical competition in the post-Soviet region did not end with the collapse of the Soviet Union. The\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/targeting-armenias-state-agency\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"WGSA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/womenwgsa\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-10-26T12:24:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-10-28T08:16:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/Website-images.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1280\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"720\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"WGSA\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"WGSA\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/en\\\/targeting-armenias-state-agency\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/en\\\/targeting-armenias-state-agency\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"WGSA\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cfba89c93f50997347944115f0e7d1d0\"},\"headline\":\"Targeting Armenia\u2019s State Agency: Information and Hybrid Tools and Russia\u2019s Attempts to Restore Its Influence\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-10-26T12:24:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-10-28T08:16:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/en\\\/targeting-armenias-state-agency\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2604,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/en\\\/targeting-armenias-state-agency\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/Website-images.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Armenia\",\"Azerbaijan\",\"Russia\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Articles\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/en\\\/targeting-armenias-state-agency\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/en\\\/targeting-armenias-state-agency\\\/\",\"name\":\"Targeting Armenia\u2019s State Agency: Information and Hybrid Tools and Russia\u2019s Attempts to Restore Its Influence - WGSA\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/en\\\/targeting-armenias-state-agency\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/en\\\/targeting-armenias-state-agency\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/Website-images.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-10-26T12:24:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-10-28T08:16:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/en\\\/targeting-armenias-state-agency\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/en\\\/targeting-armenias-state-agency\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/en\\\/targeting-armenias-state-agency\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/Website-images.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/Website-images.jpg\",\"width\":1280,\"height\":720},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/en\\\/targeting-armenias-state-agency\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Targeting Armenia\u2019s State Agency: Information and Hybrid Tools and Russia\u2019s Attempts to Restore Its Influence\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"WGSA\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"WGSA\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/WGSA-PDF-scaled.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/WGSA-PDF-scaled.png\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":979,\"caption\":\"WGSA\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/womenwgsa\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cfba89c93f50997347944115f0e7d1d0\",\"name\":\"WGSA\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/dcaa2d08ec32a21089f41c3327525d60696b09db88ffd60509d9878e0be36e77?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/dcaa2d08ec32a21089f41c3327525d60696b09db88ffd60509d9878e0be36e77?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/dcaa2d08ec32a21089f41c3327525d60696b09db88ffd60509d9878e0be36e77?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"WGSA\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wgsa.am\\\/en\\\/author\\\/wgsa\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Targeting Armenia\u2019s State Agency: Information and Hybrid Tools and Russia\u2019s Attempts to Restore Its Influence - WGSA","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/targeting-armenias-state-agency\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Targeting Armenia\u2019s State Agency: Information and Hybrid Tools and Russia\u2019s Attempts to Restore Its Influence - WGSA","og_description":"[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text woodmart_inline=”no” text_larger=”no”] Geopolitical competition in the post-Soviet region did not end with the collapse of the Soviet Union. The","og_url":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/targeting-armenias-state-agency\/","og_site_name":"WGSA","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/womenwgsa","article_published_time":"2026-10-26T12:24:49+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-10-28T08:16:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1280,"height":720,"url":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/Website-images.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"WGSA","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"WGSA","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/targeting-armenias-state-agency\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/targeting-armenias-state-agency\/"},"author":{"name":"WGSA","@id":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/cfba89c93f50997347944115f0e7d1d0"},"headline":"Targeting Armenia\u2019s State Agency: Information and Hybrid Tools and Russia\u2019s Attempts to Restore Its Influence","datePublished":"2026-10-26T12:24:49+00:00","dateModified":"2026-10-28T08:16:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/targeting-armenias-state-agency\/"},"wordCount":2604,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/targeting-armenias-state-agency\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/Website-images.jpg","keywords":["Armenia","Azerbaijan","Russia"],"articleSection":["Articles"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/targeting-armenias-state-agency\/","url":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/targeting-armenias-state-agency\/","name":"Targeting Armenia\u2019s State Agency: Information and Hybrid Tools and Russia\u2019s Attempts to Restore Its Influence - WGSA","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/targeting-armenias-state-agency\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/targeting-armenias-state-agency\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/Website-images.jpg","datePublished":"2026-10-26T12:24:49+00:00","dateModified":"2026-10-28T08:16:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/targeting-armenias-state-agency\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/targeting-armenias-state-agency\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/targeting-armenias-state-agency\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/Website-images.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/Website-images.jpg","width":1280,"height":720},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/targeting-armenias-state-agency\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Targeting Armenia\u2019s State Agency: Information and Hybrid Tools and Russia\u2019s Attempts to Restore Its Influence"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/","name":"WGSA","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/#organization","name":"WGSA","url":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/WGSA-PDF-scaled.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/WGSA-PDF-scaled.png","width":2560,"height":979,"caption":"WGSA"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/womenwgsa"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/cfba89c93f50997347944115f0e7d1d0","name":"WGSA","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dcaa2d08ec32a21089f41c3327525d60696b09db88ffd60509d9878e0be36e77?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dcaa2d08ec32a21089f41c3327525d60696b09db88ffd60509d9878e0be36e77?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dcaa2d08ec32a21089f41c3327525d60696b09db88ffd60509d9878e0be36e77?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"WGSA"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/wgsa.am"],"url":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/author\/wgsa\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12871","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12871"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12871\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12876,"href":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12871\/revisions\/12876"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12873"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12871"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12871"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wgsa.am\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12871"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}